Further blow to welfare changes!

In November, Prime Minister David Cameron, a regular visitor to the Harrow marginal constituencies, said, “Changes to welfare – to cut EU migration – will be an absolute requirement in the negotiation that I’m going to undertake” – he meant the four-year residency test for migrants claiming certain benefits, such as tax credits, child benefit and housing benefits.
“Imposing additional requirements on EU workers that do not apply to a member state’s own workers constitutes direct discrimination which is prohibited under current EU law”, now warn the government lawyers.
Did PM consult government lawyers before making such a loose statement about the exclusive benefits criteria for some, seemingly to please voters in the constituencies like Harrow West where the Tory MP candidate eventually lost or whether he made a false pledge before the election knowing that he would not be able to fulfil it? In either case, this demonstrates irresponsibility.
In a face saving exercise and to patch-up the ‘discriminatory’ move, the government now plans to include British citizens in the qualifying criteria for the working tax credits and housing benefits as well, and as the test would apply from the age of 18, anyone aged under 22 who had lived here all their life would not be eligible for tax credits.
It looks that the PM will not be able to deliver on his promises as the four-year wait for migrants is unlikely to be agreed by all 28 EU nations.
However, the future of our youth remains bleak as the government plans to strip unemployed 18-21 year olds of housing benefits as well.

Care Leavers exposed to the risk of homelessness!

Thousands of youngsters who have fled unstable backgrounds and abuse could be forced into homelessness as the government plans to strip unemployed 18-21 year olds of housing benefits, warns the Youth charity YMCA in its recent research report ‘Uncertain Futures’.
The government announced the policy shift during Chancellor George Osborne’s emergency budget, as part of its strategy for tackling youth joblessness and dependency on welfare.
This government move that exposes youngsters to the risk of homelessness has implications for Harrow as the percentage of Care Leavers in Harrow is almost equal to the England average, for example.
For many 18-21 year olds, housing benefit is not a lifestyle choice. It is something that has come out of circumstances and events that have impacted on their lives and which have meant they have nowhere to go.
Hope Harrow corporate parents have protection plan for the Care Leavers, a vulnerable group of young adults who have particular needs in relation to housing.

Health care of CLA remains an issue in Harrow!

Following the concerns about the public health staffing in Harrow, another serious matter emerged is the quality of the health services for Children Looked After (CLA) by Harrow Council in accordance with its role of Corporate Parent.
The last inspection of health services for Harrow’s children in May 2012 of safeguarding and looked after children’s services found that the Being Healthy delivery for looked-after children was inadequate (failing category) and the May 2014 Review of Health Services for Children Looked After and Safeguarding in Harrow by Care Quality Commission found that the progress in delivering an improved service overall since the 2012 inspection is disappointingly slow.
Despite action plans and the existence and sittings of the Corporate Parenting Panel, the 2015 situation remains concerning:

  • Harrow Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) reported to Corporate Parenting Panel meeting on 7 July 2015 that the “timeliness of all health assessments has been an issue for several years which was impounded by the poor collation of data … one of the contributing factors was a failure by the Local Authority to complete the referral within the agreed timescales””
  • only 11% of new CLA have had a health check in the target timescale of 28 days
  • the Designated Nurse also reported that the “timeliness of health assessments had been poor””

Many think that the Corporate Parenting Panel is not really effective and waste of public money!
It is the responsibility of the Local Authority to ensure that health assessments are carried out for every looked after child or young person.
For children under the age of 5 years, the Review Health Assessments are carried out every 6 months – this again is challenging as the percentage age of under 1 yr old CLA in Harrow at 7.1% is much higher than in London and neighbours averages, 4.7% and 4.5% respectively.

Update: Corporate Director of Children and Families has responded but with no evidence that the arrangements and outcomes for CLA have improved!

Healthy Labour leadership is important

The popularity of Jeremy Corbyn campaign for Labour leadership has reached Harrow, demonstrated by the Labour councillors supported canvassing activity at the Harrow Town Centre last Saturday (25 July)!
A campaigning socialist, the Islington North MP is leading the leadership poll which has troubled the New Labour gurus like Tony Blair and his followers like the Harrow West Labour MP who is now supporting Mr Corbyn’s rival Liz Kendall who is seen as a Blairite contender and has said Labour should not have voted for Britain to recognise the Palestinian state.
Many Harrow Labours have retained the socialist flavour which is missing from the Labour Party that has gradually lost its ideological position.
Mr Corbyn states that he stands for:

  • An end to austerity now
  • No trident nuclear weapons
  • Freedom for Palestine
  • Fighting injustice worldwide
  • Standing up for equality, peace and solidarity

Anyone who supports these policies or believes in robust opposition to the government’s devastating socio-economic and welfare measures, can register (before 12 August) to vote for Jeremy as Labour leader – click here to register.
In a healthy democracy to improve the quality of life, the quality of both the government and opposition leaderships is very significant.

Tory group lacks appreciation!

It appears to be a norm for the Conservative group to rubbish plans for major developments in Harrow.
This time they make a mountain out of a molehill regarding the planning permission for 51 College Road, Harrow.
Bit worrying that the handsomely paid Conservative planning spokesman could only quote from what others have said rather than coming out with convincing arguments of his own.
Also concerning is his grip on the Harrow’s Core Strategy and the Area Action Plan which allow opportunity for housing and employment growth and provide the contemporary policy framework for the consideration of tall building proposals.
Furthermore, there is no established fact that the plans endanger the primacy of St Mary’s landmark.
Unfortunate that because of its internal dynamics, the Conservative group has not nominated its planning expert for the planning since her return to the council and therefore Harrow can’t benefit from her expertise!

planning
In the interest of Harrow, the group should appreciate that an eye soar that has not been contributing to the local life for years, is now all set to provide much needed 318 homes, including affordable housing, and a variety of community resources.

Health challenges and public health staffing in Harrow!

Having heard concerns about the adequacy of the public health staffing in the face of some challenging situations* in Harrow, we have obtained the staffing information under Freedom of Information.
The information is the summary of the total staff, including the public health practitioners, immediately after the public health transition into local authority on 1/4/13 and then on 1/4/15 as well as the predicted staffing level on 1/4/16 – both as numbers and the full time equivalent. Latest figures show a reduction in the total number of public health practitioners since 2013.
Public health practitioners are key members of the public health workforce and can have a great influence on the health and wellbeing of individuals, groups, communities and populations. They work across the full breadth of public health from health improvement and health protection, to health information, community development, and nutrition, in a wide range of settings from.
*

  • • life expectancy is 6.8 years lower for men and 4.2 years lower for women in the most deprived areas of Harrow than in the least deprived areas
  • • incidents of TB are much higher than the national
  • • the infant mortality rate is worse
  • •25.2% of the population is under the age of twenty with 82.1% of school children coming from a black or minority ethnic group
  • • 21.2% of children aged under 16 years living in poverty
  • •the last inspection of health services for Harrow’s children in May 2012 of safeguarding and looked after children’s services found that health’s contribution to safeguarding was adequate and the Being Healthy delivery for looked-after children was inadequate (failing categories)
  • •May 2014 Review of Health Services for Children Looked After and Safeguarding in Harrow by Care Quality Commission found that the progress in delivering an improved service overall since the 2012 inspection is “disappointingly slow”
We would be interested to hear what the council is going to do to encourage and recruit more public health practitioners in Harrow to provide effective health care for all!

Harrow under Japanese knotweed attack!

The highly-invasive Japanese knotweed can re-root quickly from a tiny bit of stem. It can come up through tarmac, concrete and even the inside of houses.
If you allow the Japanese knotweed to spread onto someone else’s property, Natural England could serve you with an enforcement notice – the prevention of its spread is a legal obligation for landowners under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.You can also be prosecuted if you allow animals to suffer by eating these weeds.
It is a real pain to get rid of it and the council could help:
  • by mapping the spread of the Japanese knotweed across the borough – community champions could be trained to identify and report the weed – knowing the full extent of the problem will help the council to control and manage the weed
  • if on the private property, by informing the homeowner or landowner that the weed problem needs addressing
  • by having staff trained to inject a specialist treatment into the stem of the weed to kill it

Update:
The council has valued our suggestions about how they can help in dealing with the weed problems – following are the extracts from the Biodiversity Officer’s response:

Mapping:
Regarding mapping, the Council has enlisted the help of a specialist invasive species consultant that has now signed an agreement to use our Geographic Information System (GIS). We have sent the consultant the relevant GIS layers so it can give a cost to produce a detailed survey of the borough’s INNS. Once this is complete an invasives GiS layer will be created and subsequently a management plan. We are also working with the London Invasive Species Initiative (LISI), the Brent Catchment Partnership and the Crane Valley Partnership and will be feeding our findings into their work programmes so we can coordinate work across the region.
Training:
There is no reason why community champions cannot be trained to help identify and report invasive species – this would not only add to our developing database but help gauge full extent of the problem and help keep pace with the changes in populations of INNS thus facilitating control and management.
Certification in use of pesticides and advice:
The Council offers advice to private landowners when contacted, however, it is only responsible for Japanese knotweed on its own land, we keep a register and undertake treatment to control/eradicate invasive species and have staff and volunteers certified in the application of herbicide.

Harrow Council Corporate Plan reads well but …!

Like many previous plans, Harrow Council Corporate Plan 2014-15 reads well though its effective implementation in real terms seems less secure because:
Priorities: although the priorities are well defined but the means to achieve these (20 statements) are too many, most are long term processes and can hardly deliver the outcomes like safeguarding vulnerable adults and children in the life of one council as has been the case for the past many years where Harrow has been struggling for prompt, efficient and effective procedures to assess and address special or specific needs, including narrowing the gap in children’s learning.
Community & families: ‘community engagement’ is also a long-term process and essentially needs public confidence gained through the ethos of valuing and treating residents as customers with more and better means to inform/ be informed – for example, a user-friendly website and caring/respectful attitudes from those assessing needs, benefits and entitlements.
Councillors: the plan says that councillors should be ‘leaders in their local community, acting to deliver those things that make a big difference to communities’ -– don’t know what this actully means!
Political parties councillor candidate selection process, political group Whip and the council decisions really being made at the group meetings as well as a highly manipulative ‘cabinet system’ of governance, are not the recipe to develop effective leadership in the councillors or enable them not to tow the party political lines.
Businesses: the two bullet points give little sense of encouraging, promoting and supporting a wider range of businesses – a close study of the Brent’s commercial/ shopping structures could indicate how big, medium and small businesses are successfully catered for.

Look who is there!

Missing from the political front for sometimes, Cllr Hall, leader of the opposition (Con), indulged in point-scoring at the recent Harrow planning committee meeting that approved plans to develop the former Post Office and currently derelict site in College Road, Harrow.
The development will include affordable housing and many community resources, and can only be good as Harrow has not built enough homes to match its population growth over the years.
London Mayor asserts that it is the job of the boroughs, of government, and of private and public sector developers to deal with the housing challenges.
Cllr Hall, never had any planning responsibility, leaned on the Harrow on the Hill Trust comments and quoted from their objections at the meeting.
Her appearance at the meeting was perhaps just a precaution to ensure that the planning expert in the Tory group Cllr Ashton does not lead in criticising a planning decision again as she did in the case of the 1 Sudbury Hill development through her attendance at the meeting and subsequent letters in a local newspaper.
As a planning supremo, Cllr Ashton understands the planning policies and procedures but Harrow can’t benefit from her expertise as she has not been placed on the planning committee since her comeback to the council, seemingly because of the relationships within the Tory group under Cllr Hall’s leadership.